quote:
My previous interpretation of your stance was wrong, and I take it back.
Thanks.
Er, no. I doubt that anyone who votes for oppressors really chooses to be oppressed. Often they think they're liberating themselves, maybe with an eye to doing some oppressing of their own. Iraqis could be a case in point. They've suffered under Ba'athism-- a secular ideology. In fact, a non-ignorant Iraqi might note that some of the most antidemocratic regimes in the Muslim world (Indonesia, Brunei, Syria, Qatar) also happen to be secular. To them, Islamism might seem the alternative. There is, I hear, a bunch of stuff about kindness and mercy and so on in there.
Your judgement of ignorance might apply just as well to people here in the US who have (perhaps unwittingly) "chosen" their own oppression, even recently. Again, witness support for Ashcroftian rollbacks of our rights. But you see, these are meant for some other guy. I'd never vote to summarily strip myself of citizenship so I could be detained indefinitely without trial.
Call that mindset "ignorant" if you like. That's not where you were wrong. You were wrong to attribute to me the assertion that any population anywhere is "too ignorant to handle democracy." Democracy is a right.
I think you're also wrong to suppose that Iraqis would have to be ignorant in some special way to vote for a bad government. Happens all the time, all over the place. Big deal.
Again, they've been absolutely stomped by secularist leaders, and the likes of al-Turabi are offering them an alternative. Maybe they're comparing their own lot with that of Iranians under the Islamic Republic. I don't know how they're faring, comparatively, but I'll bet the "ignorant" fundamentalist Iraqis have some idea.
No time to address the rest, although I think we might agree that the Nazis should not have been "left to it" or whatever.
---
What others say about boorite!