Siegfried1027
stripcreator donor

home : pm : info

These comics either tell things as they are or interpret reality so as to point out how it sucks, or how it kicks ass when I'm drunk.

Your self-image depends greatly on how you view these comics. Laugh or you're an insecure EMPIRICIST goon.

Kant v. Hume

by Siegfried1027
9-04-03


	I have a big problem with your skepticism. Leaving aside noumena for the moment, can't we use the innate categories in our minds to get a priori knowledge?


	First, you have to understand that my skepticism was "mitigated." Aside from that, how can we really know anything with the mind? Isn't the phenomenal self only able to know phenomena?


	Perhaps you're right, but I just don't see why the two worlds can't participate in each other somehow. We ought at least to be able to know noumena by implication, right?


	Can you hear yourself? You claim that you want to explore the limits of reason and confine yourself to those limits, but you can't shake this unjustified attachment to rationalism.


	Eh, what I really wanted to know was how that orgy went.


	Those women were totally worth having to see Jean-Jacques naked.