Originally I had him upset, but then I looked at the comic and thought "why would he be upset about that? He's a robot - usefulness and monotony would be the "real" robot heaven - none of that "freedom" garbage". Changing his expression gave me a punch line I could live with, and a title. I like the idea of that comic, but it bothers me that I didn't consider the whole thing better - I don't know if it works well enough in 3 quick panels.
Does anyone notice how a comic can change if you read it quickly or slowly? There's a brilliant comic I saw (that I'll post in that other thread if more people think it's okay) that works if you look at it as one panel (all at once) or 3 panels consecutively.
I'm beginning to wonder some things. Comics are kind of new to me, and, in all other aspects of my life, if I were making, say, a guy-with-a-rocket-sidekick-doing-a-concert-on-TV-in-the-70's joke, based on a stupid pun and working in an awkward double entendre, an AC/DC reference and some appropriate background changes, I'd only do it if I were, say, hanging out with 35-year old record store employees. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure I'm not just doing things that can ONLY be funny to me, and complete randomness to everyone else. How do other people sense what they can get away with, audience-wise? Has it been an issue for anyone? This, to me, is the "brutal" aspect of comic-making.